GRIEKSPOOR
2.3
·
AUGER-ALIASSIME
1.69
Odds
Market
Griekspoor
Auger-Aliassime
Winner
2.3
1.69
Player analysis
T. Griekspoor shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 34. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +5.2. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. Serve quality has been average (6.9/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +20 over the last five.
DS 5.18Trend mixed
F. Auger-Aliassime has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.0, meaning F. Auger-Aliassime has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. Serve quality has been average (6.5/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability.
DS -1.02Trend mixed
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 10 Mar | Fils | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 9 Mar | Diallo | 7-6 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 7 Mar | Monfils | 7-6 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 27 Feb | Auger-Aliassime | 4-6 2-6 | W |
| 26 Feb | Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 7-6 | L |
4W 1L last 5
| 27 Feb | Rublev | 5-7 6-7 | W |
| 26 Feb | Mensik | 3-6 6-3 2-6 | W |
| 25 Feb | Griekspoor | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 24 Feb | Virtanen | 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 13 Feb | Griekspoor | 6-7 2-6 | W |
Clay court stats
GriekspoorStatAuger-Aliassime
63.1%Win rate62.4%
125–73W–L116–70
Avg stats — last 5
1st serve %60%
1st serve won80%
2nd serve won60%
BP converted70%
BP saved50%
Aces10
Double faults2
1st serve %70%
1st serve won80%
2nd serve won50%
BP converted30%
BP saved70%
Aces10
Double faults3
Head to head
1–2
Indoor 0–1
Clay 1–0
Grass 0–1
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotterdam | Indoor | Quarter-finals | Auger-Aliassime | 6-7 2-6 | |
| Mallorca | Clay | Semi-finals | Griekspoor | 6-4 6-4 | |
| Hertogenbosch | Grass | 1/8-finals | Auger-Aliassime | 6-7 6-7 |

