Odds
Player analysis
J. Pegula has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -28.9 to 39.8, with at least one match where J. Pegula was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving J. Pegula vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — J. Pegula has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -22 over recent matches.
Y. Putintseva shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 75. Point dominance has been clear and improving — average DS of +12.2, trending upward over the last three matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.9/10, leaving Y. Putintseva vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency has been exceptional (+27) — converting opportunities and shutting down threats at the critical moments.
Recent form
5W 0L last 5
| 5 Apr | Starodubtseva | 6-2 6-2 | W |
| 4 Apr | Jovic | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | W |
| 3 Apr | Shnaider | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | W |
| 2 Apr | Cocciaretto | 1-6 6-1 7-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Putintseva | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 11 Apr | Andreescu | 7-6 3-6 7-6 | W |
| 10 Apr | Cross | 6-3 7-5 | W |
| 1 Apr | Pegula | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | L |
| 30 Mar | Sun | 7-6 6-2 | W |
| 21 Mar | Rybakina | 6-3 6-3 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston | Clay | WTA 1/16-finals | Pegula | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | |
| Adelaide | Hard | Semi-finals | Pegula | 7-6 6-3 | |
| WTA Montreal | Hard | 1/16-finals | Pegula | 6-4 6-4 | |
| Toronto | Hard | Quarter-finals | Pegula | 6-3 6-3 |

