Odds
Player analysis
T. M. Etcheverry comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -2.6, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -23 over recent matches.
F. Comesana comes into this match in difficult form — 1 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.7, meaning F. Comesana has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.8/10, leaving F. Comesana vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — F. Comesana has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -15 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 29 Apr | Buse | 7-6 6-3 | L |
| 22 Apr | Machac | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | L |
| 14 Apr | Comesana | 6-3 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 6 Apr | Cobolli | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | L |
| 5 Apr | Quinn | 5-7 2-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 28 Apr | Etcheverry | 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 26 Apr | Prizmic | 6-2 4-6 3-6 | W |
| 24 Apr | Ofner | 4-6 4-6 | W |
| 15 Apr | Borges | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 9 Apr | Alcaraz | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rio de Janeiro | Clay | 1/16-finals | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |
| Hamburg | Clay | 1/16-finals | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-3 |