Odds
Player analysis
T. M. Etcheverry shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 80. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -1.9 to 9.2, with at least one match where T. M. Etcheverry was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -12 over recent matches.
F. Comesana comes into this match in difficult form — 1 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -5.6, meaning F. Comesana has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.7/10, leaving F. Comesana vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — F. Comesana has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -27 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 6 Mar | Korda | 7-5 6-0 | L |
| 25 Feb | Comesana | 6-7 7-6 3-6 | W |
| 23 Feb | Comesana | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | L |
| 17 Feb | Comesana | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | W |
| 11 Feb | Carabelli | 6-4 7-6 | L |
2W 3L last 5
| 7 Mar | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-2 6-7 | W |
| 22 Feb | Tabilo | 6-3 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 22 Feb | Etcheverry | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | L |
| 20 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
| 19 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rio de Janeiro | Clay | 1/16-finals | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |
| Hamburg | Clay | 1/16-finals | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-3 |

