Odds
Player analysis
A. Sabalenka has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.3. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.0/10, leaving A. Sabalenka vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Sabalenka has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -11 over recent matches.
B. Krejcikova has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -9.6 to 11.1, with at least one match where B. Krejcikova was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving B. Krejcikova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 24 May | Baptiste | 6-7 7-6 6-2 | L |
| 16 May | Krejcikova | 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 15 May | Osorio | 2-6 6-1 5-7 | W |
| 14 May | Krejcikova | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 13 May | Krejcikova | 6-2 6-7 6-2 | L |
2W 3L last 5
| 9 May | Sabalenka | 6-2 3-6 5-7 | W |
| 7 May | Sabalenka | 6-2 6-3 | L |
| 28 Apr | Sabalenka | 6-2 2-6 6-7 | W |
| 27 Apr | Sabalenka | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 25 Apr | Sabalenka | 6-1 6-4 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rome | Clay | WTA 1/32-finals | Sabalenka | 6-2 6-3 | |
| WTA Australian Open | Hard | Quarter-finals | Sabalenka | 2-6 3-6 | |
| WTA Stuttgart | Clay | 1/8-finals | Sabalenka | 2-6 3-6 | |
| WTA Miami | Hard | 1/8-finals | Sabalenka | 3-6 2-6 | |
| WTA Indian Wells | Hard | 1/8-finals | Sabalenka | 3-6 6-2 4-6 | |
| Dubai | Hard | Quarter-finals | Krejcikova | 2 - 1 | |
| US Open | Hard | Quarter-finals | Sabalenka | 1-6 4-6 |

