Odds
Player analysis
A. Parks comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -5.0, meaning A. Parks has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.3/10, leaving A. Parks vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency has been exceptional (+33) — converting opportunities and shutting down threats at the critical moments.
M. Stoiana comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.8, meaning M. Stoiana has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.8/10, leaving M. Stoiana vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — M. Stoiana has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -11 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 20 May | Teichmann | 3-6 4-6 | L |
| 18 May | Uchijima | 6-2 6-4 | W |
| 13 May | Bandecchi | 4-6 5-7 | L |
| 11 May | Stoiana | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | W |
| 4 May | Galfi | 4-6 1-6 | L |
2W 3L last 5
| 21 May | Krueger | 6-7 6-3 6-1 | L |
| 20 May | Jorge | 6-4 6-4 | W |
| 18 May | Janicijevic | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | W |
| 11 May | Parks | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | L |
| 2 May | Boluda | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parma | Clay | 1/16-finals | Parks | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | |
| Charleston | Clay | WTA 1/32-finals | Parks | 2-6 6-4 6-1 |

