Odds
Player analysis
M. Kecmanovic shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 54. Point dominance has been clear and improving — average DS of +12.3, trending upward over the last three matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving M. Kecmanovic vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
T. M. Etcheverry comes into this match in difficult form — 1 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -2.9, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -22 over recent matches.
Recent form
4W 1L last 5
| 24 May | Etcheverry | 3-6 4-6 2-6 | W |
| 20 May | Paul | 6-7 7-6 7-6 | L |
| 18 May | Atmane | 2-6 6-7 | W |
| 9 May | Etcheverry | 7-5 2-6 3-6 | W |
| 28 Apr | Etcheverry | 3-6 4-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 24 May | Kecmanovic | 7-6 6-3 6-4 | L |
| 17 May | Kecmanovic | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | L |
| 16 May | Tabilo | 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 15 May | Carabelli | 1-6 1-6 | W |
| 14 May | Riedi | 3-6 2-6 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Open | Hard | 1/64-finals | Etcheverry | 2-6 6-3 6-4 3-6 4-6 | |
| Stockholm | Indoor | 1/8-finals | Etcheverry | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | |
| ATP Paris | Indoor | 1/32-finals | Etcheverry | 6-4 6-7 4-6 | |
| French Open | Clay | 1/64-finals | Kecmanovic | 6-3 7-5 6-3 |

