Odds
Player analysis
M. Chwalinska comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -21.2 to 42.5, with at least one match where M. Chwalinska was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.7/10, leaving M. Chwalinska vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +19 over the last five.
D. Semenistaja comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -8.4, meaning D. Semenistaja has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.2/10, leaving D. Semenistaja vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — D. Semenistaja has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -18 over recent matches.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 19 Mar | Semenistaja | 4-6 1-6 | W |
| 17 Mar | Semenistaja | 2-6 3-6 | W |
| 16 Mar | Semenistaja | 6-0 6-4 | L |
| 3 Mar | Semenistaja | 2-6 1-6 | W |
| 2 Mar | Semenistaja | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 23 Mar | Chwalinska | 3-6 1-6 | W |
| 12 Mar | Chwalinska | 7-6 3-6 6-7 | W |
| 11 Mar | Chwalinska | 6-0 6-0 | L |
| 6 Mar | Uchijima | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | L |
| 5 Mar | Papamichail | 2-6 0-6 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rende | Clay | 1/8-finals | Chwalinska | 6-0 6-4 | |
| Montreux | Clay | Final | Chwalinska | 6-1 6-2 | |
| Buenos Aires Challenger Women | Clay | 1/16-finals | Semenistaja | 3-6 6-4 2-6 | |
| Warsaw Challenger Women | Hard | Quarter-finals | Chwalinska | 5-7 6-4 2-6 |

