Odds
Player analysis
F. Cerundolo has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -12.8 to 27.8, with at least one match where F. Cerundolo was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving F. Cerundolo vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — F. Cerundolo has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -13 over recent matches.
T. M. Etcheverry shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 80. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -1.9 to 9.2, with at least one match where T. M. Etcheverry was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -12 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 7 Mar | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-2 6-7 | W |
| 22 Feb | Tabilo | 6-3 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 22 Feb | Etcheverry | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | L |
| 20 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
| 19 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buenos Aires | Clay | Semi-finals | Cerundolo | 6-3 7-5 | |
| Toronto | Hard | 1/16-finals | Cerundolo | 3-6 4-6 | |
| Santiago | Clay | Quarter-finals | Cerundolo | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | |
| ATP US Open | Hard | 1/32-finals | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-4 4-6 6-1 3-6 | |
| ATP Santiago | Clay | 1/8-finals | Etcheverry | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | |
| Cordenons | Clay | Final | Cerundolo | 6-1 6-2 |

