Match winner market — Pinnacle open → close
Tour
MatchTournamentHome CLVAway CLVResult
ChinaX. Yao
ChinaX. You
CH-W
Jiujiang (China) - Qualification
Jiujiang - Semi-finals
2.552.65
-3.8%
vs mkt: +9.2%
1.551.51
+2.4%
vs mkt: -0.8%
X. You5-7 2-6
ChinaZ. Bai
TaiwanE. S. Liang
CH-W
Jiujiang (China) - Qualification
Jiujiang - Semi-finals
1.421.44
-0.8%
vs mkt: +2.7%
2.982.93
+1.7%
vs mkt: +4.9%
E. S. Liang6-7 5-7
EstoniaM. Lajal
South KoreaS. Kwon
CH-M
Wuxi
Wuxi - Semi-finals
2.512.51
0.0%
vs mkt: +3.4%
1.571.57
-0.3%
vs mkt: +4.6%
S. Kwon6-7 3-6
USAC. Gauff
ArgentinaS. Sierra
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
1.111.10
+0.5%
vs mkt: +0.8%
8.048.36
-3.8%
vs mkt: +16.8%
C. Gauff5-7 6-0 6-4
FranceC. Moutet
SpainP. Llamas Ruiz
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.781.69
+5.4%
vs mkt: -1.0%
2.122.26
-6.2%
vs mkt: +5.8%
P. Llamas Ruiz4-6 6-3 6-7
ArgentinaT. A. Tirante
United KingdomC. Norrie
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
2.092.09
0.0%
vs mkt: -8.8%
1.831.83
0.0%
vs mkt: +11.0%
T. A. Tirante6-3 7-5
WorldA. Rublev
SerbiaM. Kecmanovic
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.461.41
+3.6%
vs mkt: -1.0%
2.923.15
-7.3%
vs mkt: +10.3%
A. Rublev6-4 6-4
BrazilG. Heide
DenmarkA. Holmgren
CH-M
Francavilla
Francavilla - Semi-finals
1.291.24
+4.1%
vs mkt: -0.3%
3.834.37
-12.4%
vs mkt: +18.0%
G. Heide6-4 1-6 6-1
CroatiaM. Cilic
SpainM. Landaluce
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.621.56
+3.3%
vs mkt: +0.4%
2.412.53
-4.7%
vs mkt: +4.7%
M. Landaluce4-6 4-6
ItalyJ. Paolini
BelgiumE. Mertens
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
2.162.04
+5.9%
vs mkt: -3.2%
1.771.88
-5.8%
vs mkt: +8.4%
E. Mertens6-4 6-7 3-6
UkraineO. Oliynykova
Czech RepublicL. Noskova
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
3.733.75
-0.5%
vs mkt: +4.9%
1.311.31
+0.1%
vs mkt: +1.7%
L. Noskova1-6 3-6
CanadaF. Auger-Aliassime
ArgentinaM. Navone
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.561.55
+0.8%
2.542.57
-1.2%
M. Navone6-7 6-7
ChileC. Garin
SpainA. Davidovich Fokina
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
2.402.20
+9.1%
vs mkt: -6.2%
1.621.74
-6.9%
vs mkt: +9.1%
A. Davidovich Fokina6-7 4-6
ArgentinaT. M. Etcheverry
ItalyM. Bellucci
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.361.31
+3.8%
vs mkt: +0.4%
3.403.71
-8.4%
vs mkt: +6.3%
M. Bellucci7-5 2-6 3-6
USAR. Seggerman
ArgentinaF. Diaz Acosta
CH-M
Francavilla
Francavilla - Semi-finals
4.865.03
-3.4%
vs mkt: +18.4%
1.211.20
+0.8%
vs mkt: +0.3%
F. Diaz Acosta3-6 0-6
FranceA. Tubello
UzbekistanM. Timofeeva
CH-W
Istanbul (Turkey) - Qualification
Istanbul - Semi-finals
2.432.40
+1.3%
vs mkt: +4.3%
1.601.62
-1.4%
vs mkt: +2.4%
M. Timofeeva4-6 6-4 0-6
ChinaQ. Zheng
LatviaJ. Ostapenko
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
1.521.46
+4.2%
vs mkt: +0.5%
2.682.93
-8.5%
vs mkt: +7.3%
J. Ostapenko6-4 4-6 4-6
WorldA. Sabalenka
RomaniaS. Cirstea
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
1.171.15
+1.6%
vs mkt: +1.6%
5.756.44
-10.7%
vs mkt: +8.6%
S. Cirstea6-2 3-6 5-7
FranceF. Bax
ArgentinaF. Ribero
CH-M
Brazzaville
Brazzaville - Semi-finals
1.141.13
+0.2%
vs mkt: +1.0%
6.436.54
-1.7%
vs mkt: +18.2%
F. Bax6-4 6-3
BrazilL. A. Miguel
ArgentinaH. Casanova
CH-M
Santos
Santos - Semi-finals
2.232.21
+0.9%
vs mkt: +5.1%
1.721.72
0.0%
vs mkt: +2.9%
H. Casanova3-6 4-6
ItalyF. Cobolli
FranceT. Atmane
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.361.37
-0.4%
vs mkt: +0.7%
3.383.34
+1.2%
vs mkt: +5.8%
F. Cobolli7-6 6-3
GeorgiaN. Basilashvili
USAB. Shelton
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
3.994.13
-3.4%
vs mkt: +4.3%
1.281.27
+1.1%
vs mkt: +1.5%
N. Basilashvili6-4 6-7 6-3
USAF. Tiafoe
PeruI. Buse
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
2.432.13
+14.1%
vs mkt: -7.3%
1.611.68
-4.2%
vs mkt: +3.4%
F. Tiafoe6-7 6-3 6-2
SwitzerlandV. Golubic
WorldM. Andreeva
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
15.1116.31
-7.4%
vs mkt: +18.3%
1.051.05
+0.1%
vs mkt: +1.7%
M. Andreeva1-6 6-4 0-6
ItalyJ. Sinner
AustriaS. Ofner
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
1.011.01
0.0%
vs mkt: -0.1%
44.8144.81
0.0%
vs mkt: +93.3%
J. Sinner6-3 6-4
SerbiaH. Medjedovic
BrazilJ. Fonseca
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
2.562.67
-4.1%
vs mkt: +9.3%
1.561.53
+1.8%
vs mkt: -1.7%
H. Medjedovic3-6 6-3 7-6
USAT. Townsend
USAI. Jovic
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
2.172.14
+1.4%
vs mkt: +2.5%
1.761.79
-2.0%
vs mkt: +2.7%
I. Jovic5-7 2-6
ItalyA. Pellegrino
FranceA. Fils
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
9.049.26
-2.4%
vs mkt: +10.5%
1.091.09
-0.2%
vs mkt: +1.4%
Pending
SwitzerlandB. Bencic
WorldA. Kalinskaya
WTA
Rome
1/16-finals
1.361.36
+0.5%
vs mkt: +1.3%
3.373.47
-2.9%
vs mkt: +6.4%
A. Kalinskaya4-6 3-6
AustraliaA. Popyrin
Czech RepublicJ. Mensik
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
3.143.01
+4.3%
vs mkt: +1.8%
1.411.44
-1.9%
vs mkt: +2.5%
A. Popyrin6-3 2-6 6-4
Czech RepublicT. Machac
WorldD. Medvedev
ATP
Rome
1/32-finals
2.362.35
+0.4%
vs mkt: +2.7%
1.641.64
0.0%
vs mkt: +1.3%
D. Medvedev0-0
Jiujiang (China) - QualificationHardJiujiang - Semi-finals
X. Yao
ChinaX. Yao
Home · 2.552.65-3.8%
X. You
ChinaX. You
Away · 1.551.51+2.4%
Result:X. You5-7 2-6
Jiujiang (China) - QualificationHardJiujiang - Semi-finals
Z. Bai
ChinaZ. Bai
Home · 1.421.44-0.8%
E. S. Liang
TaiwanE. S. Liang
Away · 2.982.93+1.7%
Result:E. S. Liang6-7 5-7
WuxiHardWuxi - Semi-finals
M. Lajal
EstoniaM. Lajal
Home · 2.512.510.0%
S. Kwon
South KoreaS. Kwon
Away · 1.571.57-0.3%
Result:S. Kwon6-7 3-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
C. Gauff
USAC. Gauff
Home · 1.111.10+0.5%
S. Sierra
ArgentinaS. Sierra
Away · 8.048.36-3.8%
Result:C. Gauff5-7 6-0 6-4
RomeClay1/32-finals
C. Moutet
FranceC. Moutet
Home · 1.781.69+5.4%
P. Llamas Ruiz
SpainP. Llamas Ruiz
Away · 2.122.26-6.2%
Result:P. Llamas Ruiz4-6 6-3 6-7
RomeClay1/32-finals
T. A. Tirante
ArgentinaT. A. Tirante
Home · 2.092.090.0%
C. Norrie
United KingdomC. Norrie
Away · 1.831.830.0%
Result:T. A. Tirante6-3 7-5
RomeClay1/32-finals
A. Rublev
WorldA. Rublev
Home · 1.461.41+3.6%
M. Kecmanovic
SerbiaM. Kecmanovic
Away · 2.923.15-7.3%
Result:A. Rublev6-4 6-4
FrancavillaClayFrancavilla - Semi-finals
G. Heide
BrazilG. Heide
Home · 1.291.24+4.1%
A. Holmgren
DenmarkA. Holmgren
Away · 3.834.37-12.4%
Result:G. Heide6-4 1-6 6-1
RomeClay1/32-finals
M. Cilic
CroatiaM. Cilic
Home · 1.621.56+3.3%
M. Landaluce
SpainM. Landaluce
Away · 2.412.53-4.7%
Result:M. Landaluce4-6 4-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
J. Paolini
ItalyJ. Paolini
Home · 2.162.04+5.9%
E. Mertens
BelgiumE. Mertens
Away · 1.771.88-5.8%
Result:E. Mertens6-4 6-7 3-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
O. Oliynykova
UkraineO. Oliynykova
Home · 3.733.75-0.5%
L. Noskova
Czech RepublicL. Noskova
Away · 1.311.31+0.1%
Result:L. Noskova1-6 3-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
F. Auger-Aliassime
CanadaF. Auger-Aliassime
Home · 1.561.55+0.8%
M. Navone
ArgentinaM. Navone
Away · 2.542.57-1.2%
Result:M. Navone6-7 6-7
RomeClay1/32-finals
C. Garin
ChileC. Garin
Home · 2.402.20+9.1%
A. Davidovich Fokina
SpainA. Davidovich Fokina
Away · 1.621.74-6.9%
Result:A. Davidovich Fokina6-7 4-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
T. M. Etcheverry
ArgentinaT. M. Etcheverry
Home · 1.361.31+3.8%
M. Bellucci
ItalyM. Bellucci
Away · 3.403.71-8.4%
Result:M. Bellucci7-5 2-6 3-6
FrancavillaClayFrancavilla - Semi-finals
R. Seggerman
USAR. Seggerman
Home · 4.865.03-3.4%
F. Diaz Acosta
ArgentinaF. Diaz Acosta
Away · 1.211.20+0.8%
Result:F. Diaz Acosta3-6 0-6
Istanbul (Turkey) - QualificationClayIstanbul - Semi-finals
A. Tubello
FranceA. Tubello
Home · 2.432.40+1.3%
M. Timofeeva
UzbekistanM. Timofeeva
Away · 1.601.62-1.4%
Result:M. Timofeeva4-6 6-4 0-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
Q. Zheng
ChinaQ. Zheng
Home · 1.521.46+4.2%
J. Ostapenko
LatviaJ. Ostapenko
Away · 2.682.93-8.5%
Result:J. Ostapenko6-4 4-6 4-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
A. Sabalenka
WorldA. Sabalenka
Home · 1.171.15+1.6%
S. Cirstea
RomaniaS. Cirstea
Away · 5.756.44-10.7%
Result:S. Cirstea6-2 3-6 5-7
BrazzavilleClayBrazzaville - Semi-finals
F. Bax
FranceF. Bax
Home · 1.141.13+0.2%
F. Ribero
ArgentinaF. Ribero
Away · 6.436.54-1.7%
Result:F. Bax6-4 6-3
SantosClaySantos - Semi-finals
L. A. Miguel
BrazilL. A. Miguel
Home · 2.232.21+0.9%
H. Casanova
ArgentinaH. Casanova
Away · 1.721.720.0%
Result:H. Casanova3-6 4-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
F. Cobolli
ItalyF. Cobolli
Home · 1.361.37-0.4%
T. Atmane
FranceT. Atmane
Away · 3.383.34+1.2%
Result:F. Cobolli7-6 6-3
RomeClay1/32-finals
N. Basilashvili
GeorgiaN. Basilashvili
Home · 3.994.13-3.4%
B. Shelton
USAB. Shelton
Away · 1.281.27+1.1%
Result:N. Basilashvili6-4 6-7 6-3
RomeClay1/32-finals
F. Tiafoe
USAF. Tiafoe
Home · 2.432.13+14.1%
I. Buse
PeruI. Buse
Away · 1.611.68-4.2%
Result:F. Tiafoe6-7 6-3 6-2
RomeClay1/16-finals
V. Golubic
SwitzerlandV. Golubic
Home · 15.1116.31-7.4%
M. Andreeva
WorldM. Andreeva
Away · 1.051.05+0.1%
Result:M. Andreeva1-6 6-4 0-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
J. Sinner
ItalyJ. Sinner
Home · 1.011.010.0%
S. Ofner
AustriaS. Ofner
Away · 44.8144.810.0%
Result:J. Sinner6-3 6-4
RomeClay1/32-finals
H. Medjedovic
SerbiaH. Medjedovic
Home · 2.562.67-4.1%
J. Fonseca
BrazilJ. Fonseca
Away · 1.561.53+1.8%
Result:H. Medjedovic3-6 6-3 7-6
RomeClay1/16-finals
T. Townsend
USAT. Townsend
Home · 2.172.14+1.4%
I. Jovic
USAI. Jovic
Away · 1.761.79-2.0%
Result:I. Jovic5-7 2-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
A. Pellegrino
ItalyA. Pellegrino
Home · 9.049.26-2.4%
A. Fils
FranceA. Fils
Away · 1.091.09-0.2%
RomeClay1/16-finals
B. Bencic
SwitzerlandB. Bencic
Home · 1.361.36+0.5%
A. Kalinskaya
WorldA. Kalinskaya
Away · 3.373.47-2.9%
Result:A. Kalinskaya4-6 3-6
RomeClay1/32-finals
A. Popyrin
AustraliaA. Popyrin
Home · 3.143.01+4.3%
J. Mensik
Czech RepublicJ. Mensik
Away · 1.411.44-1.9%
Result:A. Popyrin6-3 2-6 6-4
RomeClay1/32-finals
T. Machac
Czech RepublicT. Machac
Home · 2.362.35+0.4%
D. Medvedev
WorldD. Medvedev
Away · 1.641.640.0%
Result:D. Medvedev0-0

Closing Line Value Report — Saturday, May 9, 2026

Covering 7 active tournaments, the May 09, 2026 closing line report tracks 31 completed Pinnacle markets. Sharp signals were present in 17 matches, and 10 results went against the pre-match favourite. Full CLV data, line movements, and upset analysis follow below.

Closing Line Value Leaders

Rome produced the day's most significant line movement: F. Tiafoe opened at 2.43 and closed at 2.13, a 14.1% shift consistent with sharp money entering the market. The match ended in a win (6-7 6-3 6-2). Elsewhere, A. Holmgren in Francavilla showed a 12.4% Pinnacle move (3.83 → 4.37), costing early bettors 12.4% CLV. In the Challenger circuit, S. Cirstea versus A. Sabalenka in Rome registered the third-largest move of the day at 10.7%.

Where the Favourites Failed

Upsets were a recurring theme, with 10 lower-ranked or higher-priced players advancing. E. S. Liang in Jiujiang (China) - Qualification delivered the most notable upset, beating Z. Bai at 2.98. The result was not foreshadowed by line movement — Pinnacle moved E. S. Liang's line only 1.7% before close. A. Kalinskaya in Rome also caused a surprise at 3.37, defeating B. Bencic 6-4 6-3. Combined, these upsets resulted in 10 Pinnacle favourites failing to hold serve, underscoring that even sharp markets express probabilities, not certainties.

Tournament Final Recap

The most significant match came at the semi-final stage of Istanbul (Turkey) - Qualification. M. Timofeeva defeated A. Tubello 6-4 4-6 6-0, with Pinnacle moving M. Timofeeva's line 1.4% before close — a negative signal, as the line drifted heading into the match.

End of Day: CLV Totals

By close, 31 Pinnacle tennis markets had settled. Statistical highlights: 55% of favourites were successful, 10 underdogs prevailed, and 5 markets saw zero line movement from open to close. The zero-movement matches typically involve heavy favourites (odds below 1.10) where Pinnacle's confidence is high and sharp money finds no edge to exploit. 16% of the day's markets fell into this category.

Frequently Asked Questions — Closing Line Value in Tennis Betting

What is closing line value (CLV) in tennis betting?

Closing line value measures the difference between the odds you bet at and the final odds Pinnacle offered just before the match started. If you bet at 2.00 and the match closed at 1.80, you have positive CLV — you obtained a better price than the final market. CLV is widely considered the most reliable indicator of long-term profitability in sports betting, because Pinnacle's closing line incorporates all available sharp money and represents the most accurate probability estimate available to the public.

Why does DeuceHQ use Pinnacle as the reference bookmaker?

Pinnacle is the industry benchmark for sharp money. Unlike most bookmakers, Pinnacle does not limit or ban winning bettors — they welcome sharp action. This means their odds reflect the true market consensus and are harder to beat. When Pinnacle's line moves significantly from open to close, it signals that informed bettors have entered the market. The vs mkt column on this page compares Pinnacle's closing price to the average of other major bookmakers, showing where the sharpest market diverged from the wider betting market.

How is the CLV percentage calculated on this page?

CLV% measures the value of your bet relative to the closing line: ((odds you bet at − closing odds) / closing odds) × 100. On this page we use Pinnacle's opening price as the reference — the CLV% shows what you would have captured had you bet at open. A positive CLV% means the odds shortened from open to close (you would have obtained a better price than the final market); a negative CLV% means the odds drifted. All calculations use Pinnacle's official open and close prices sourced in real time.