Odds
Player analysis
C. Gauff shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 31. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.6. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.4/10, leaving C. Gauff vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +11 over the last five.
M. Sakkari has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -20.0 to 17.1, with at least one match where M. Sakkari was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.6/10, leaving M. Sakkari vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +17 over the last five.
Recent form
4W 1L last 5
| 10 Mar | Sakkari | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 7 Mar | Sakkari | 7-5 6-0 | L |
| 13 Feb | Sakkari | 6-3 4-6 1-6 | W |
| 12 Feb | Swiatek | 6-2 4-6 5-7 | W |
| 11 Feb | Gracheva | 6-7 0-6 | W |
0W 5L last 5
| 6 Mar | Gauff | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 20 Feb | Svitolina | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | L |
| 19 Feb | Gauff | 6-0 6-2 | L |
| 18 Feb | Gauff | 2-6 7-6 6-3 | L |
| 17 Feb | Gauff | 6-4 6-4 | L |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTA United Cup | Hard | Gauff | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Miami | Hard | 1/16-finals | Gauff | 6-2 6-4 | |
| Indian Wells | Hard | 1/16-finals | Gauff | 7-6 6-2 | |
| WTA Indian Wells | Hard | Semi-finals | Sakkari | 4-6 7-6 2-6 | |
| WTA Beijing | Hard | Quarter-finals | Gauff | 2-6 4-6 | |
| WTA Washington | Hard | Final | Gauff | 2-6 3-6 | |
| Rome | Clay | 1/8-finals | Sakkari | 4-6 5-7 | |
| Doha | Hard | Quarter-finals | Sakkari | 3-6 3-6 | |
| Abu Dhabi | Hard | 1/16-finals | Sakkari | 7-5 6-2 |

