Odds
Player analysis
J. Lehecka comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -5.5, meaning J. Lehecka has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.7/10, leaving J. Lehecka vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
T. M. Etcheverry shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 80. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -1.9 to 9.2, with at least one match where T. M. Etcheverry was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -12 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 7 Mar | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-2 6-7 | W |
| 22 Feb | Tabilo | 6-3 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 22 Feb | Etcheverry | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | L |
| 20 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
| 19 Feb | Etcheverry | 7-6 6-4 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 8 Mar | Baez | 6-4 6-1 | L |
| 26 Feb | Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 25 Feb | Carreno-Busta | 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 24 Feb | Nardi | 6-4 4-6 2-6 | W |
| 19 Feb | Lehecka | 3-6 3-6 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Open | Hard | 1/32-finals | Lehecka | 3-6 6-0 6-2 6-4 | |
| Hamburg | Clay | Quarter-finals | Etcheverry | 7-5 6-3 | |
| Gstaad | Clay | 1/16-finals | Lehecka | 1-6 3-6 | |
| Santiago | Clay | Quarter-finals | Etcheverry | 4-6 3-6 |

